Vulnerability details

7.5/10
CVSS 3.1
GHSA-7wch-p9px-956x
in_triage Published 2026-10-30 Updated 2026-10-30
Vulnerability Data from Dependency-Track
Description
### Summary `pem.decode()`, which every node-forge API that parses PEM input uses, split messages with a regular expression that takes polynomial time on input without a matching END line, and parsed encapsulated headers with regular expressions that take quadratic time on long header lines. A remote attacker can block the Node.js event loop for seconds to minutes with a crafted input of a few tens of kilobytes. Fixed in node-forge 1.4.1. ### Details `pem.decode()` in `lib/pem.js` found PEM messages with this regular expression: /\s*-----BEGIN ([A-Z0-9- ]+)-----\r?\n?([\x21-\x7e\s]+?(?:\r?\n\r?\n))?([:A-Za-z0-9+\/=\s]+?)-----END \1-----/g The optional headers group and the body group are adjacent, lazy, and share characters (whitespace and the base64 alphabet), and the match must end with an END line whose label equals the BEGIN label (`\1`). When no such END line follows, the engine tries every split of the text between the two groups, for every label split and at every BEGIN line in the input. The work grows polynomially with the input length (roughly cubic for repeated BEGIN/END lines with mismatched labels, quadratic for a BEGIN line followed by many newlines). The encapsulated header parsing in the same function had two smaller quadratic cases: trimming each header line with `/\s+$/`, and an unanchored header regex `([\x21-\x7e]+):...` that retries at every position of a long line without a colon. These are reachable when a message does match. All PEM entry points call `pem.decode()`, including `pki.certificateFromPem()`, `pki.privateKeyFromPem()`, `pki.publicKeyFromPem()`, `pki.certificationRequestFromPem()`, `pki.encryptedPrivateKeyFromPem()`, `pki.decryptRsaPrivateKey()` and `pkcs7.messageFromPem()`. The fix replaces the message regular expression with a scanner that indexes the END lines once and matches each BEGIN line in linear time, finding the same messages as before. The one difference: a label containing `-----` (`-----BEGIN A-----B-----`) was matched as `A-----B` if possible; now only the shortest label, `A`, is used. RFC 7468 labels can't contain `--`. Header parsing now trims lines with a loop and only starts a header match at the beginning of a run of printable characters, which gives the same result. #### Patches Fixed in node-forge 1.4.1. PEM messages and encapsulated headers are now parsed in linear time. #### Workarounds Rejecting untrusted PEM input larger than a few kilobytes before passing it to node-forge limits the delay but doesn't remove it: on 1.4.0, about 7 KB of crafted input blocked for 0.4 s, and 29 KB for 24 s. #### Credits Reported by Ahmed Mokhtari (@AhmedMokhtari), @mwlik and @imenyoo2, and independently by @offset, @bibu123456 (coordinated by @Kayiz-PT), and @Mucahic. ### Proof of concept var forge = require('node-forge'); var pem = ' -----BEGIN I-----G-----END B'.repeat(1000) + '\x00'; // 29 KB try { forge.pki.certificateFromPem(pem); } catch(e) {} On 1.4.0 (Node.js 24) this call blocks for about 24 seconds before throwing "Invalid PEM formatted message."; 14 KB takes about 3 seconds. A BEGIN line followed by 32 KB of newlines and no END line takes about 1.5 seconds, and the time grows quadratically from there. On 1.4.1 each of these inputs is rejected in a few milliseconds, and 1 MB inputs of any of these shapes take under 100 ms. The PoC is in tests/pocs/ghsa-7wch-p9px-956x.js. Regression tests are in tests/unit/pem.js ("GHSA-7wch-p9px-956x ReDoS checks"). ### Impact Any application that passes untrusted PEM text to node-forge is affected: for example, services that accept uploaded certificates, keys or certificate signing requests, or that parse certificates from configuration, SAML metadata or other user-supplied documents. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send a small crafted input that blocks the Node.js event loop for seconds to minutes per request, so the process stops serving other requests. Repeated requests keep it unavailable. There is no confidentiality or integrity impact.
Analysis Read only

CVE is a trademark and the CVE logo is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation. CVE data may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate. This website and all information provided are offered on an “as is” basis without warranties of any kind. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the CVE Program or The MITRE Corporation.

This site uses data from the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), obtained through Dependency-Track, but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD or the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). NVD data may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) is owned and managed by FIRST.Org, Inc. and used by permission. The links on CVSS vectors open the FIRST CVSS calculators (CVSS 3.0, 3.1 and 4.0), or the NVD calculator for CVSS 2.0. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by FIRST.

GitHub is a trademark of GitHub, Inc. GHSA identifiers and advisory data come from the GitHub Advisory Database, licensed under CC-BY 4.0. GHSA data may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by GitHub, Inc.

Source of the EUVD data: European Vulnerability Database (EUVD), © European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), reused with acknowledgement of the source as provided by the ENISA legal notice and IPR policy. Changes: CVEManager does not display the EUVD records as such; it uses their aliases to link the CVE and GHSA identifiers designating the same vulnerability. EUVD data may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by ENISA or the European Union.