Vulnerability details

2.1/10
CVSS 4.0
GHSA-m5mm-p8h7-m29v
resolved Published 2026-10-23 Updated 2026-10-23
Vulnerability Data from Dependency-Track
Description
### Impact `serialize-javascript` escapes its output so it is safe to embed inside a `<script>` element. Before 7.1.3 that guarantee did not hold for a **function value whose source ends in a bare `</script`**. Each function body is escaped on its own, and a bare `</script` was only neutralized when followed — within the same body — by a character the HTML tokenizer treats as ending the tag name (TAB, LF, FF, CR, SPACE, `/` or `>`). A body ending exactly at `</script` has no following character, so it was emitted unescaped. The delimiter is then supplied by the surrounding output (for example the newline the `space` option emits after the value), and a later serialized value can supply the closing `>` followed by markup: ```js const serialize = require('serialize-javascript'); function f() {} f.toString = () => 'function f(){ return 1 }//</script'; function g() {} g.toString = () => 'function g(x){ return x } > <img src=x onerror=alert(1)>'; serialize({ a: { f }, g }, { space: 2 }); // { // "a": { // "f": function f(){ return 1 }//</script // }, // "g": function g(x){ return x } > <img src=x onerror=alert(1)> // } ``` Embedded in a `<script>` element, the script ends at the injected tag and the `<img>` becomes a live element in the page. Exploitation requires an attacker to control the **source text** of a serialized function, in practice through a spoofed `toString()`. Real functions always end in `}`, so ordinary function values are not affected, and non-function values (including strings containing `</script`) are escaped correctly. ### Patches Fixed in **7.1.3** (#235). The bare `</script` form is now also matched at the end of the function body, so it is escaped regardless of what follows it in the output. ### Workarounds Upgrade to **7.1.3**. If you cannot upgrade, do not serialize function values whose source text (or `toString()`) can be influenced by an attacker. ### Credits Reported by **ha_kr25** via the Yahoo bug bounty program.
Same vulnerability as
CVE-2026-115897 resolved according to EUVD-2026-109190
Analysis Read only Updated 2026-10-26

CVE is a trademark and the CVE logo is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation. CVE data may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate. This website and all information provided are offered on an “as is” basis without warranties of any kind. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the CVE Program or The MITRE Corporation.

This site uses data from the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), obtained through Dependency-Track, but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD or the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). NVD data may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) is owned and managed by FIRST.Org, Inc. and used by permission. The links on CVSS vectors open the FIRST CVSS calculators (CVSS 3.0, 3.1 and 4.0), or the NVD calculator for CVSS 2.0. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by FIRST.

GitHub is a trademark of GitHub, Inc. GHSA identifiers and advisory data come from the GitHub Advisory Database, licensed under CC-BY 4.0. GHSA data may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by GitHub, Inc.

Source of the EUVD data: European Vulnerability Database (EUVD), © European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), reused with acknowledgement of the source as provided by the ENISA legal notice and IPR policy. Changes: CVEManager does not display the EUVD records as such; it uses their aliases to link the CVE and GHSA identifiers designating the same vulnerability. EUVD data may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by ENISA or the European Union.