Vulnerability details

3.7/10
CVSS 3.1
GHSA-w7fw-mjwx-w883
false_positive Published 2026-02-12 Updated 2026-02-12
Vulnerability Data from Dependency-Track
Description
### Summary The `arrayLimit` option in qs does not enforce limits for comma-separated values when `comma: true` is enabled, allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. This is a bypass of the array limit enforcement, similar to the bracket notation bypass addressed in GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p (CVE-2025-15284). ### Details When the `comma` option is set to `true` (not the default, but configurable in applications), qs allows parsing comma-separated strings as arrays (e.g., `?param=a,b,c` becomes `['a', 'b', 'c']`). However, the limit check for `arrayLimit` (default: 20) and the optional throwOnLimitExceeded occur after the comma-handling logic in `parseArrayValue`, enabling a bypass. This permits creation of arbitrarily large arrays from a single parameter, leading to excessive memory allocation. **Vulnerable code** (lib/parse.js: lines ~40-50): ```js if (val && typeof val === 'string' && options.comma && val.indexOf(',') > -1) { return val.split(','); } if (options.throwOnLimitExceeded && currentArrayLength >= options.arrayLimit) { throw new RangeError('Array limit exceeded. Only ' + options.arrayLimit + ' element' + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? '' : 's') + ' allowed in an array.'); } return val; ``` The `split(',')` returns the array immediately, skipping the subsequent limit check. Downstream merging via `utils.combine` does not prevent allocation, even if it marks overflows for sparse arrays.This discrepancy allows attackers to send a single parameter with millions of commas (e.g., `?param=,,,,,,,,...`), allocating massive arrays in memory without triggering limits. It bypasses the intent of `arrayLimit`, which is enforced correctly for indexed (`a[0]=`) and bracket (`a[]=`) notations (the latter fixed in v6.14.1 per GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p). ### PoC **Test 1 - Basic bypass:** ``` npm install qs ``` ```js const qs = require('qs'); const payload = 'a=' + ','.repeat(25); // 26 elements after split (bypasses arrayLimit: 5) const options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 5, throwOnLimitExceeded: true }; try { const result = qs.parse(payload, options); console.log(result.a.length); // Outputs: 26 (bypass successful) } catch (e) { console.log('Limit enforced:', e.message); // Not thrown } ``` **Configuration:** - `comma: true` - `arrayLimit: 5` - `throwOnLimitExceeded: true` Expected: Throws "Array limit exceeded" error. Actual: Parses successfully, creating an array of length 26. ### Impact Denial of Service (DoS) via memory exhaustion. ### Suggested Fix Move the `arrayLimit` check before the comma split in `parseArrayValue`, and enforce it on the resulting array length. Use `currentArrayLength` (already calculated upstream) for consistency with bracket notation fixes. **Current code** (lib/parse.js: lines ~40-50): ```js if (val && typeof val === 'string' && options.comma && val.indexOf(',') > -1) { return val.split(','); } if (options.throwOnLimitExceeded && currentArrayLength >= options.arrayLimit) { throw new RangeError('Array limit exceeded. Only ' + options.arrayLimit + ' element' + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? '' : 's') + ' allowed in an array.'); } return val; ``` **Fixed code:** ```js if (val && typeof val === 'string' && options.comma && val.indexOf(',') > -1) { const splitArray = val.split(','); if (splitArray.length > options.arrayLimit - currentArrayLength) { // Check against remaining limit if (options.throwOnLimitExceeded) { throw new RangeError('Array limit exceeded. Only ' + options.arrayLimit + ' element' + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? '' : 's') + ' allowed in an array.'); } else { // Optionally convert to object or truncate, per README return splitArray.slice(0, options.arrayLimit - currentArrayLength); } } return splitArray; } if (options.throwOnLimitExceeded && currentArrayLength >= options.arrayLimit) { throw new RangeError('Array limit exceeded. Only ' + options.arrayLimit + ' element' + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? '' : 's') + ' allowed in an array.'); } return val; ``` This aligns behavior with indexed and bracket notations, reuses `currentArrayLength`, and respects `throwOnLimitExceeded`. Update README to note the consistent enforcement.
Same vulnerability as
CVE-2026-2391 false_positive according to EUVD-2026-6720
Analysis Read only

CVE is a trademark and the CVE logo is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation. CVE data may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate. This website and all information provided are offered on an “as is” basis without warranties of any kind. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the CVE Program or The MITRE Corporation.

This site uses data from the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), obtained through Dependency-Track, but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD or the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). NVD data may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) is owned and managed by FIRST.Org, Inc. and used by permission. The links on CVSS vectors open the FIRST CVSS calculators (CVSS 3.0, 3.1 and 4.0), or the NVD calculator for CVSS 2.0. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by FIRST.

GitHub is a trademark of GitHub, Inc. GHSA identifiers and advisory data come from the GitHub Advisory Database, licensed under CC-BY 4.0. GHSA data may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by GitHub, Inc.

Source of the EUVD data: European Vulnerability Database (EUVD), © European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), reused with acknowledgement of the source as provided by the ENISA legal notice and IPR policy. Changes: CVEManager does not display the EUVD records as such; it uses their aliases to link the CVE and GHSA identifiers designating the same vulnerability. EUVD data may be incomplete, delayed, or inaccurate. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by ENISA or the European Union.